From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F19143DA7DC for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774343269; cv=none; b=PTphDlK1hXYTgwB+uJd4d8ulJbNflkUpV8DK4PZ/w1Px0YxGpd3hGPw4rRp/hf3tNXUwBEw018qobYq4jLyToKDYKfg+8VzyO+dmZMGg8WneMkbT/WeyOrnuh1RLuBNHNy1MPaS2yTTebl2T+VfCR/QS7jDDK63QEKAUNGv2HV4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774343269; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N+1s6Yd2EUPD4ASBnn91RuBAGAclvxgBWXPOgLFzdwE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=g2WmzmPdCaYOOgZ/FbFgpyf/csO3C+vSXS5t5gpHqLIjlHuVwOx9G236dEUl3u1n2qVTmJXFnLg2RMZA83c8WdWk2ChrewVJPg20fMVWTZjF5Qz6nbnrexZd5Saa3HfmEQsmpyEqLhWg5xg+py8QkzWuL9xM5fQZwUYuF3hl8eg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=Dosj3sTS; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=yUCowb/h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="Dosj3sTS"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="yUCowb/h" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC89A1400213; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:07:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:07:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1774343263; x=1774429663; bh=Oqcc+z1qnF K056K7p6/ciRaVx8DIDKaL3nq+lfJYx2o=; b=Dosj3sTSyFngvQzoe0B97QqtEc OASiSGXp6CGAWc7qGnCie0X72rydlwFN4GSGv6Jy2wu1WWcE+/BfYcpS3zvllqky qGnYRlB5x3VH8eGdyZhiZuJvPFPtwDN2CZHUZJ8q/5PQzp+/bPELRoDAuUiiAl08 V21tVP6qxxjik6uIVWtL60OGbRHb4cuTAF/f7/1LU6AjxN2vYjhQ4cKpnkMxTzwV IwodnHNftTtcXfhF6nztkl1HGoizQV67Q18EtCV8wmEcL2VAAWlKhyE969La9HOF 5VCMHOXlqhTKCKZFLBzPAHtFy1JZDS+3R2YXyQXNMyJyrS47/Sli1IU/ZWFQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1774343263; x=1774429663; bh=Oqcc+z1qnFK056K7p6/ciRaVx8DIDKaL3nq +lfJYx2o=; b=yUCowb/hA8bjYPEKSuEDNY3XI/unyu3fGdAKpWBwlmMvjM0JLLD BWIYSL4anCKVvnWXDQhjdjKX03rJG1RVi6sxftWTt3xGvqT5YsRvRCV50lJZfPSv Jd1UfroWOnf6SxHW3WUQ90bbFDGFX0JTumCWxdkp5tsqwbe5iQSvjPtRszpC059B BKajrCdgwizXUHF6fd3TvS5g4gj0ZEvru8VzNKRUdttIHBV6xNKwmqs2OpLmE6D/ vRxYj1o0sskHeMbv7OS1avehE6pj3XZTJDX4wnt0q0EaOgyA7TZkKFCEZa/HdqJt w9SEdEwgi3Nup+XmO/0iLrPluJ5scf9hIuA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdefvdduudekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgt khcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epveekkeffhfeitdeludeigfejtdetvdelvdduhefgueegudfghfeukefhjedvkedtnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhssehpkh hsrdhimhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepkedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthht ohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsthgvrggumh honhesghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdp rhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepvghmih hlhihshhgrfhhfvghrsehgohhoghhlvgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegrughrihgrnhdr rhgrthhiuhestgholhhlrggsohhrrgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehkrhhishhtohhffh gvrhhhrghughhssggrkhhksehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehsrghn uggrlhhssegtrhhushhthihtohhothhhphgrshhtvgdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 05:07:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4f595d18 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:07:37 +0100 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Adrian Ratiu Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Emily Shaffer , Josh Steadmon , Kristoffer Haugsbakk , "brian m . carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Run hooks in parallel Message-ID: References: <20260204173328.1601807-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> <20260320135311.331463-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com> <87h5q660un.fsf@gentoo.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h5q660un.fsf@gentoo.mail-host-address-is-not-set> On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 05:07:28PM +0200, Adrian Ratiu wrote: > On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Adrian Ratiu writes: > > > >> Range-diff v3 -> v4: > >> 1: 6686d92867 = 1: ec274c24e5 repository: fix repo_init() memleak due to missing _clear() > > > > This one is not included in the set. This cover letter identifies > > itself as [0/9], but the range-diff implies it should have 10 > > patches. > > > > Curious. > > > > In the meantime, let me resurrect the corresponding patch from the > > previous, trusting that range-diff deems them identical. > > Yes, it's identical. Sorry for missing that 1 patch. > > I mis-typed git format-patch HEAD~9 instead of HEAD~10. :) I can only recommend the use of b4. It will make your life a ton easier with mailing list based workflows as you don't have to manually keep track of shenanigans like that. Patrick