Re: [PATCH] docs: fix git stash grammar

[Mirko Faina <mroik@delayed.space>]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 12:17:46PM -0400, D. Ben Knoble wrote:
> Now, _is_ the grammar bracketed wrong? "git help stash" says
> 
>            For quickly making a snapshot, you can omit "push". In this mode,
>            non-option arguments are not allowed to prevent a misspelled
>            subcommand from making an unwanted stash entry. The two exceptions
>            to this are stash -p which acts as alias for stash push -p and
>            pathspec elements, which are allowed after a double hyphen -- for
>            disambiguation.
> 
> So _if_ you want to provide options (other than "-p"), the "push" is
> required. I think the existing brackets indicate that.

When it says "In this mode, non-option arguments are not allowed"
wouldn't -m be allowed as it is an option and not a non-option? In fact
if we do try to run "git stash -m something" it does correctly stash
while if we do something like "git stash pathspec" it does give back
"fatal: subcommand wasn't specified; 'push' can't be assumed due to
unexpected token 'pathspec'".

If that is the case then there is an issue with the way the usage
tooltip shows the optionality of "push".