Re: [PATCH v2] odb: add write_packfile, for_each_unique_abbrev, convert_object_id

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 02:21:07PM +0000, apaterson@pm.me wrote:
> Of course, and my apologies, gitgadget is not formatting these
> messages as clearly as I would like them to be.
> 
> Both this series and the last were adapted from my fork that supports
> [1] with a feature similar to gitremote-helpers. My hope is that the
> fork can converge with master so that sqlite-git can become
> redistributable. The local backends vtable was already a step in this
> direction, so the question is if letting users bring their own local
> backends, the way they currently can with helpers for remote backends,
> is in scope for git core.

Thanks for the context! This also matches with our eventual goal, even
though we rather envision that it makes more sense to maybe use a plugin
in the form of a shared object instead of using a helper executable.

> Either way, it sounds like series 1 will be covered by upstream, so
> next I would like to contribute support for git-local-* helpers. This
> allows users to create .git repositories with storage formats other
> than packs and builtin alternatives like reftables, which seems
> appropriate as direct sqlite support would probably be out of scope
> for core. Local helpers are already implemented in [2] but if it makes
> sense to hold off and rebuild it after e.g.
> ps/odb-generic-object-name-handling is merged, I am not in such a
> rush.

I've currently got around 10 more patch series pending that are mostly
ready to be sent out, but that all build on one another. As said, there
is a ton of stuff changing in the area of pluggable object databases,
and I expect it'll probably take two more Git releases until we have
fully carved out the foundation. Once that's done I think it should
become quieter, and at that point it'll become easier to also do
drive-by contributions without requiring too much coordination.

You can have a look at [1], which is our (non-official and
GitLab-specific) epic for the work that we have planned over the next
few months. Maybe it helps you a bit to figure out where we're going.

More concretely, next steps will be:

  - I plan to turn in-memory, loose and packed backends into proper ODB
    sources.

  - I plan to introduce backend-specific consistency checks.

  - I plan to introduce backend-specific logic for optimizations.

  - I plan to introduce backend-specific logic of generating packfiles.

  - Justin is revamping how writes work and plans to refactor existing
    callers that do ad-hoc transactions. This will also eventually cover
    writing packfiles into the ODB.

If you'd like to get involved earlier I'd propose that we sync off-list
to figure out how to collaborate without stepping on each others toes
all the time :)

Thanks!

Patrick