From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.delayed.space (delayed.space [195.231.85.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F8A1D88A4 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.231.85.169 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774628296; cv=none; b=ngrFo2R5/1VXnPfiBiS4F++D96wjVFC422D/3dsgiHOy4yonDmhXMeR7kyh/z/UeVFnAjqBZw1cJ2V0nTGQphxcTMVhA2SypRUvUuNhWk/k8mYc53YkokWGcVTu/YFmT1a57RgMEos1yMauWYUAqk3Qi5h4y+BGlRMUby4+hafc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774628296; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0KWBlnyXmrITZ/fNJvol90MhAdgEfFaFk6ZFGA141jk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=k3gnftrFxdpAM6ajMytZd2I9qG9Z5TPQRmq72q1UlRmS+HBi3jRr9HWzvEpcLFygWQjMDBj2h5yhfoX1RHQrAQHA2ZxO6k+7Y7JK9kXYiaoXQsXiXOPsx6FeLuNbzwHVRo86WmM779ZEQxadwFk3Fkmx3fE/PEFAhZwtNc28c1w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=delayed.space; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=delayed.space; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=delayed.space header.i=@delayed.space header.b=KqeQFTe3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.231.85.169 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=delayed.space Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=delayed.space Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=delayed.space header.i=@delayed.space header.b="KqeQFTe3" Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:18:10 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delayed.space; s=dkim; t=1774628292; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E7hkNrXNrX3y2RRYgslvVXG84OEvte/w9IXB+F9H06M=; b=KqeQFTe3ROYAa/Esyp4An0ZYrOVLUE5ZYmonkkI+cN6n/fz/8mdS0BGRQVAExULmltWoHn epMnRCRWWpcblwO/FbwBMXNGSRRHBAZSTNoXd+exLpT+BpHrs5dYLgJ3eTIMTjGaz17MoM lE6tGbTOExNG5u5Jo4mfUWCWxTYBGq9seYLBl6r7yiMUJkU1kwcNHnVh4HD/gQlJRWmxgU 0U8Xa8yv7Meo17dQ2LALQZV+hju3gF0dLxHkegd29Y1qk1qqp6rAJrI6BXefZwAS0E2WZw v4UEo4kgiQWdxiBgfdTne0PmRbaJykZC5s25uyFbueGtQG7giY6EoecYO/1A9g== Authentication-Results: mail.delayed.space; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=mroik@delayed.space From: Mirko Faina To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Mirko Faina Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] improve "git format-patch --commit-list-format" Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: -- On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:04:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > When the payload _can_ be specified to wrap (i.e., end-user > configurable output format), the wrapping should not be forced by > the mechanism. A project that is not ours may want to keep a single > long line for their commit list entries. > > I do not mind if the default "modern" were defined to include %w() > to force wrapping to those who follow the default, of course. But > do not unconditionally wrap what the end-user formatted to their > liking. I see, since there's not much to edit, I'll send the changes regarding the docs and the wrapping in a single series (I saw that you already made mf/format-patch-commit-list-format-doc but I hope it is not a problem), instead of submitting a new one.