From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Santi_B=E9jar?=" Subject: Re: Git weekly news: 2008-49 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 22:44:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <94a0d4530812041643r784ae8b1x242e3b2f9c9f41@mail.gmail.com> <94a0d4530812050946r5ea7ddb2v1d93d28ba679813b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jakub Narebski" , "git list" To: "Felipe Contreras" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 05 22:46:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L8iV6-0000B8-5T for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:46:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756000AbYLEVo6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:44:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755961AbYLEVo6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:44:58 -0500 Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.44.28]:41969 "EHLO yx-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755891AbYLEVo5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:44:57 -0500 Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so122391yxm.1 for ; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:44:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.126.15 with SMTP id y15mr301210anc.123.1228513496337; Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:44:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.135.12 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:44:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <94a0d4530812050946r5ea7ddb2v1d93d28ba679813b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2008/12/5 Felipe Contreras : > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Jakub Narebski wrote: [...] >>> But here are the links anyway. The order is rather random. >> >> Moreover the _quality_ of those links is very random. > > Exactly, I didn't choose them, that's what people have been tagging as > "git" in delicious.com. I'm subscribed to the RSS feed and saving the > ones that appear a lot. > > In fact I don't like some of them, but that's what the "public" finds > interesting. So I don't see the value of such a list. You can go to delicious and get it. Another thing that could be great is filtering this list to those that pass a certain criteria (mainly quality, up to date, ...) and present it in an attractive way, with summaries, categorized by type (trick, tutorial, comparison,...), ... Just my 2cents Santi