From: "Santi Béjar" <santi@agolina.net>
To: Eric Raible <raible+git@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Colorization of log --graph
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:04:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adf1fd3d0903181004k2554ae90uc101aad64947be7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20090318T164728-444@post.gmane.org>
2009/3/18 Eric Raible <raible+git@gmail.com>:
> This may be clueless (I suspect that it is) but I have never understood
> the meaning of the different line colors in gitk. They seems arbitrary to me.
>
> I get that the current HEAD is represented as a yellow dot, but that's it.
> (As an aside, it might be nice if merges had a different color dot than
> normal commits).
>
> Can anyone clue me in?
Gitk paints lines of development (lineal history without merges nor
forks) with the same color.
HTH,
Santi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 10:05 [RFC] Colorization of log --graph Allan Caffee
2009-03-18 11:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-19 16:59 ` Allan Caffee
2009-03-19 17:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-19 21:48 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-03-20 19:13 ` Allan Caffee
2009-03-20 19:58 ` Jeff King
[not found] ` <20090321175726.GA6677@linux.vnet>
2009-03-30 14:13 ` [RFC/PATCH] graph API: Added logic for colored edges Allan Caffee
[not found] ` <cover.1238428115u.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
2009-03-30 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] graph.c: avoid compile warnings Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-30 15:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 16:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-30 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] --graph: respect --no-color Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-30 16:04 ` [RFC/PATCH] graph API: Added logic for colored edges Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-31 10:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-31 10:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2009-03-31 12:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-31 10:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-20 20:13 ` [RFC] Colorization of log --graph Junio C Hamano
2009-03-18 16:52 ` Eric Raible
2009-03-18 17:04 ` Santi Béjar [this message]
2009-03-18 17:29 ` Eric Raible
2009-03-19 19:32 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-03-19 19:52 ` Eric Raible
2009-03-19 20:04 ` Markus Heidelberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adf1fd3d0903181004k2554ae90uc101aad64947be7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=santi@agolina.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raible+git@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).