From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Santi_B=E9jar?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] init: support --import to add all files and commit right after init Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:49:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1237978720-2500-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <20090325124219.GA5307@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , =?UTF-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 25 13:51:16 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LmSZf-00066P-Ah for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:51:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752715AbZCYMtp (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:49:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753509AbZCYMto (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:49:44 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com ([209.85.220.158]:52127 "EHLO mail-fx0-f158.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752178AbZCYMto (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:49:44 -0400 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so14890fxm.37 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.24.17 with SMTP id b17mr4165774muj.112.1237985380919; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:49:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090325124219.GA5307@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: 2009/3/25 Jeff King : > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> > > +If no message is given, "Initial commit" will be used. >> > >> > Why a default message and not running the editor? >> >> Because I would say "Initial commit" anyway. And I would say "Commit inicial". > > Agreed. This feature is about convenience. ... for project in english. > If you really want to say > something more exciting, then use "git commit" directly. Heck, you can > even "git commit --amend" it afterwards. I can. But then it is no longer "convenience". But anyway, it is like the "Merge branch..." commit message for merges. So nothing new. Santi