Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] Documentation: branch.*.merge can also afect 'git-push'

["Santi Béjar" <santi@agolina.net>]

2009/3/30 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> I'll take [1/4] and [2/4] with minor rewording, and I think [4/4] is not
> necessary (push.default is clear enough---and defaultMode won't make it
> any clearer to the first time readers anyway as it is unspecified what
> kind of "mode" it is talking about).

At least to me, mode in the context of 'push' suggest behavior. But
maybe only for second time readers...

>
> I do not understand this [3/4].  I did look at push.default but it is
> unclear how this variable is involved.
>
> Perhaps it is because the word "tracking" in the description "push the
> current branch to the branch it is tracking" is used without explaination.

Maybe the push.default description needs some enhancements, but this
[3/4] is true.

> I think the author meant to say if your local branch frotz by default
> merges changes made to the branch nitfol of the remote repository, "frotz
> tracks nitfol", but the use of the word "track" for that meaning appears
> nowhere in Documentation/glossary-content.txt

So we can define:

push.default = "tracking" = "push the current branch to its upstream branch"

The "upstream branch" is defined in branch.name.merge and could also
be added to glossary-content.

Santi