git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Santi Béjar" <santi@agolina.net>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] remote tracking: return the tracking branch for  the given branches
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:40:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adf1fd3d0906180740t637da9braea02deb3cba2680@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906181617.07802.jnareb@gmail.com>

2009/6/18 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, 18 June 2009, Santi Béjar wrote:
>> 2009/6/18 Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>:
>
> [cut]
>> >
>> >  $ git remote tracking <remote> <remote branch>
>> >
>> > would show all local branches that track <remote branch>, and have
>> > <remote> as default remote,
>>
>> Maybe my description is unclear, but it's not about local branches
>> which track <branch> on <remote>, it is about the local branch
>> representation of the remote branch, i.e. not 'master' but
>> origin/master (git remote tracking origin master in a default clone).
>
> Ah, the problem with the same (or similar) name for two different
> things.  If we have local branch 'local' set to track branch 'master'
> on remote 'origin', we have:
>
>   /------- local repository ------\            /- origin -\
>  /                                 \          /            \
>  |                                 |          |            |
>  'local'  -------->  'origin/master' -----------> 'master'
>  refs/heads/local    refs/remotes/origin/master   refs/heads/master
>
>  branch.local.remote = origin
>  branch.local.merge  = refs/heads/master
>
>  remote.origin.fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
>
> 'origin/master' is called remote-TRACKING branch (for 'master' branch
> on remote 'origin').  Setting up automerge information for local branch
> 'local' which _follows_ branch 'master' on remote 'origin' is done
> using --TRACK option to git-branch.
>
> Therefore the confusion.

OK, but I wonder if the documentation for the new command is clear
enough or can be improved.

>
>
> Do I understand correctly that you want for
>
>  $ git remote tracking origin master
>
> to return
>
>  origin/master

In this particular case (the above settings) not exactly, as master
does not match exactly the lhs of the refspec. It would be:

$ git remote tracking origin refs/heads/master
refs/remotes/origin/master

>
> (and perhaps also origin/HEAD?).

HEAD is another beast, as the local HEAD symlink is a local config,
that defaults to the remote default branch, but that you can change
with "git remote set-head".

Ops, you are saying to return origin/HEAD for "git remote tracking
origin master", no? I don't think it makes sense, I think of "git
remote tracking" more as a mapping function, it applies the map (the
refspec) to the given argument.

Santi

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-18 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-18  7:57 [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Support for arbitrary mapping for "git pull --rebase" Santi Béjar
2009-06-18  7:57 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/2] remote tracking: return the tracking branch for the given branches Santi Béjar
2009-06-18 11:52   ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-06-18 13:23     ` Santi Béjar
2009-06-18 12:35   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-06-18 13:22     ` Santi Béjar
2009-06-18 13:44       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-18 13:55         ` Santi Béjar
2009-06-18 14:17           ` Jakub Narebski
2009-06-18 14:40             ` Santi Béjar [this message]
2009-06-18 19:01               ` Santi Béjar
2009-06-18 19:19                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-06-18 21:31                   ` Santi Béjar
2009-06-18  7:57 ` branch.<branch>.merge and --format='%(upstream)' Santi Béjar
2009-06-18  7:57 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/2] get_remote_merge_branch: Support for arbitrary mapping Santi Béjar
2009-06-18  9:27   ` Santi Béjar
2009-06-18  8:41 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/2] Support for arbitrary mapping for "git pull --rebase" Johannes Schindelin
2009-06-18  9:24   ` Santi Béjar
2009-06-19 13:42     ` Santi Béjar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adf1fd3d0906180740t637da9braea02deb3cba2680@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=santi@agolina.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).