From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from complex.crustytoothpaste.net (complex.crustytoothpaste.net [172.105.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F9234A799 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776809613; cv=none; b=gDJbQT0b/4qkFx1PXSZ09thI+TAycAO85PUxO4inJHC8Lg7R6uTN/k0YT6HcTRUKZ2unSyF5va82EQ15eUUHcSBprLLo19vYjGNoNm5WSFZGDSnDiJHp4ksafvluRf7IfnlkcRN3hDk9GM15iPsTQlaFKtsvnJNQXRJ/jhI45Os= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776809613; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DSTwp4gJEvnsYI9QYL1z2o+tlnAaIlyJkns3JnzQQn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CEMzMEKOaB/CKaNbjbqJILGWj5cCYy/xPOBZj3xWtA5vI0R3pofhI1IE5Gy447v9vsIRE7ZWPSylyjttdC4fhnTMkkfobc84ES/FBjE9cE7VuZoVb6FStG8wHFLyBjnzE9RHln2x+L5Nf7LZmNZfWk4ZgjUS/KhA/41IBLLnPNc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b=vtPG1Ubq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="vtPG1Ubq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1776809605; bh=DSTwp4gJEvnsYI9QYL1z2o+tlnAaIlyJkns3JnzQQn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=vtPG1UbqHNbESSMTf2jsLUYDYOwCsJ50nOR9ZP8qzZ3bMngmFykmuW5shCh9l0K0D I3+SBhWVPcFB/f+W0D4N1F8Aii/xaaSLOfeJYh6HPAb0i1yIcOuD1xsZaZs5Rjty/+ Jap1YA0eXZd+wPcxESPkThfJX3nR7hdtv7VTEoZ2pltcRw5RtfiQeZtscNXfA+3ce4 lonNyHRsry0Wab9HqWV8EyUchu4ou23x75rKZWZwTPY7znf37YcUjAYogdZl6BRpsf hwYbM1LFr4THDFHnz34qrX3ziM9WB83ir6C6keheKITSDvZLIE01OuQyOJsPyyM0Tl J9RUXHu93lKMzDycg/7t8ha0yr5SbX1ojNjqq+bMQNJ4oU9BeJ8Vhi4zwZRhgdsIrW xpp4N0Jxfrnz/UCrWUvI8eAKlnwpwbjc4ReqTVriATOHbtbcanHdWifxrEkIk/AdUR ftkcrOgU8rR05wEQEKdaRdnRje1GollQHgWyAwSA/J/5X4SSmON Received: from fruit.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2c0:f00f:f901:5ad8:61c3:7428:ec68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by complex.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22F30200FF; Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:13:23 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: Kushal Das Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] v2.45+: git commit -S invalidates signature for non-UTF-8 messages Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , Kushal Das , git@vger.kernel.org References: <4d5d04e2-49c4-4781-a289-f8cf79570643@sunet.se> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wvrlMylemSpu7cJl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) --wvrlMylemSpu7cJl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2026-04-21 at 07:39:11, Kushal Das wrote: > I am also wondering in the test harness for git signing, if you want to > include other tools than gnupg for testing. The signing code is abstract at that point in the code, so it should work identically with SSH or X.509 and I don't think a separate test is necessary. --=20 brian m. carlson (they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA --wvrlMylemSpu7cJl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wr0EABYKAG8Fgmnn9oMJEHwMSWKIh6KBRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ4g/19FDgczVjZoewzdqWERzMz+UG/6qPEWJgSa5akbz FiEECCzmip28ZfuD0cORfAxJYoiHooEAAOV7AP9overOSWX4Ghu/AyI2Ku7JlK8D yWL6hhl+lanif/rhRAEA8+8ZKsWUW0KsD5oAfXyKV41uujos8KskyRfdlZjJog0= =AN+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wvrlMylemSpu7cJl--