From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6321E492D for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 10:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778493741; cv=none; b=ji5eb23aODkVc0Rys7C/3hDKjUpWHB1M5Jqkmhw/wtZHwtaTe2NVlIN1OqWhZaB9KmEMJU5y7ehDf8QTRvzYFpGSj2EtJ6uMeho3q6l7bbg4NBa7odMw5JmeCfU94vGVGh502FoJMWIRgYKgT7N/aBLi/kVvoUbnb04iA9ubZMI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778493741; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RdGtrZlmGTYMFGKoR0Rc4BMDYYVP0jI3kdY3IYAc3i8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cLGE9SB7ZieGdz5SyK6kQF/r43vI3lFnuZqjTwGb+tFNoo7hbRdBHzJJdMjclYPN1xz046kmL1dp+5JV4VYmP1mqcccOTOPIv7giwlJ/iGiWZecDrmSLZYMvSKyefO8d36z9v3LCx1amQhfXnygl0qKKwrgtj5fMPFkLtUGT8iQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=INGSZcwh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=FFzvtWB3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="INGSZcwh"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="FFzvtWB3" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E964140001B; Mon, 11 May 2026 06:02:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 May 2026 06:02:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1778493739; x=1778580139; bh=9AQNL27nwZ W0CeD8ORGBaGpN8swiCUMfUV35uQwIcb0=; b=INGSZcwhAf/uCWQU/5Bn9NvmQ2 uJaAIPM6TTHAtiVOs/YwTIX7bhU90GTYY4xXfmd1gtz5kzP0ZTULyDrP67RWaVKB ef8qCp7bcKxVaAOC7w6zPCoZD9G5TyqMFXs7s7m/9EALuiUS/cFUOfg7k/SVVz24 WTYwxBv3TF22Pu1nfkok0zRPM/g0bziCxL0uj2df1NOAFA8kBJSzWDFC+byef74M Sun3YIWww64NW/0a8n51BghM8bYFUS/odjIxQ6jrRMakiRFU5G4sCVmQdOe9t7Uk 0O9Fab0o4ikET6pNDpxtwcZLKzbUu5Kh8zQwXQ7KJV1edCoHVY7cLXR/y5Vg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1778493739; x=1778580139; bh=9AQNL27nwZW0CeD8ORGBaGpN8swiCUMfUV3 5uQwIcb0=; b=FFzvtWB3wdVkita/1fuMWAEmdzhUZhaG8o1CTzziRIDNqz+HgIv GBqRegYGUCa8CV4My5dEYAP/kjLx9Dm59ItUhik4tlmuEf3vAGzxI5SzLLjmdmnG 5XSWNS2Q2kQvMdfk7fG6UcM/ifdKLoIDJy5Bpvm8G067TZA5p4lFx+EzHSanco7i JS0sTOG++Tg0KaEgomF0+hY0Njb7DMe5n+744nUb1qVLiS4dIXM9JV9okGVzhPlH Yi1h5fgyQAWGq8/jjrVdxlEc79EziIn0bALMDdS/uSSHjeojjXg9sjzAuZzuQamB ac5gV3FKQit9FPxPdWgvnVPBl6XVdYvP+ZA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdduudekieehucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgt khcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epveekkeffhfeitdeludeigfejtdetvdelvdduhefgueegudfghfeukefhjedvkedtnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhssehpkh hsrdhimhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepjedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthht ohepghhithhgihhtghgrughgvghtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhith hsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehtsghovghgihesfigvsgdruggv pdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvgh gvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhgrnhhnvghsrdhstghhihhn uggvlhhinhesghhmgidruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtohhlvggvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtoh hm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 11 May 2026 06:02:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 426c6fb1 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 11 May 2026 10:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 12:02:14 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= , Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: enable EXPENSIVE for contributor builds Message-ID: References: <2159f6a271b06d156134392ce3c44fe957c83378.1778228209.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 05:29:01PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt writes: > > > So with this change we now run the tests for all "official" branches, > > and on pull requests. Which raises the question: are there any events > > that happen regularly that are excluded by this? Because if not I think > > it might be sensible to just enable this unconditionally, also because > > that would make jobs on GitLab CI run expensive tests, as well. > > The simplicity certainly is tempting. > > We could instead do the "let's enable only on linux-test-vars" kind > of "optimization", which is on the other side of the extreme, but > that is only valid if the kind of bugs that can be revealed only by > EXPENSIVE tests, which may not be caught by others, is expected to > be pretty much platform or configuration agnostic. I somehow doubt > that it is the case. Yeah, it's probably not. > In any case, I think spending on more machine cycles is certainly > cheaper than human resources for things like this. Agreed. Patrick