From: Matthew Hughes <matthewhughes934@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suggetsions for collaboration workflows in large repos
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 19:06:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahnUeESE1x802Z9N@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260529163117.z2auhbg4sdxxgmis@archP14s>
On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 05:31:17PM +0100, Matthew Hughes wrote:
> I thought about doing something like tracking
> `refs/heads*/some-colleague-branch` from the remote, since with the wildcard
> `*` I at least won't the fatal error on the missing reference during fetch, but
> that risks my config containing an ever growing list of such wildcards, or a
> bunch of manual work occasionally cleaning up old ones (or maybe that could be
> automated).
I hacked some scripts to automate this. Firstly, one for fetching:
1. Fetches the branch
2. Adds a fetch config with wildcard hacks so `git fetch` brings in updates for
that branch (the refspec should match _exactly_ that branch and never
anything more)
3. Adds a separate ref to record that we're tracking this branch (so something
knows to clean it up later)
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -o errexit -o pipefail -o nounset
# save command as e.g. git-fetch-other
CMD_NAME="$(basename "$0" | sed 's/git-//g')"
if [ $# -lt 1 ]
then
echo "usage: git $CMD_NAME branch-name [ remote-name ]" >&2
exit 1
fi
BRANCH_NAME="$1"
REMOTE_NAME="${2:-origin}"
FETCH_CONFIG_NAME="remote.$REMOTE_NAME.fetch"
git fetch "$REMOTE_NAME" "$BRANCH_NAME"
git checkout -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
# we want to record that we are tracking this branch, to do this create
# a new ref whose name tells us what we're tracking, but whose value is
# unimportant. So as a placeholder value just use the hash of an empty tree
# taken from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/commit/?id=9c8a294a1ae1335511475db9c0eb8841c0ec9738
EMPTY_TREE_REF="$(git hash-object -t tree /dev/null)"
# refspec used to track the branch: we expect branches to be deleted from the
# upstream when merged so tracking exactly:
# "+refs/heads/$BRANCH_NAME:refs/remotes/$REMOTE_NAME/$BRANCH_NAME" will error
# when we go to fetch that exact ref after its removed upstream.
# so HACK around this: add wildcards that we still expect to only ever match
# this exact branch (but doesn't have the issue of git complaining when it
# tries to fetch an _exact_ ref)
TRACKING_REFSPEC="+refs/heads*/$BRANCH_NAME:refs/remotes*/$REMOTE_NAME/$BRANCH_NAME"
# record that we're tracking this branch. First check we've not already
# recorded this, then ...
if ! git config get --local --fixed-value --value "$TRACKING_REFSPEC" "$FETCH_CONFIG_NAME" >/dev/null
then
# ... set the config to track it for fetching, and ...
git config set --comment "$CMD_NAME: tracking at $(date -I)" --local --append "$FETCH_CONFIG_NAME" "$TRACKING_REFSPEC"
# ... record that we have special cased this tracking
git update-ref "refs/tracked/$REMOTE_NAME/$BRANCH_NAME" "$EMPTY_TREE_REF"
fi
And the cleanup script (needs to be run periodically):
1. Collects all the remote branches we know about
2. Checks all the references from step 3. above and checks if any branches
defined there are missing remotes (I have fetch.prune=true to keep the remote
tracking references up-to-date)
3. If they are, drops the tracking config for that branch
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -o errexit -o pipefail -o nounset
REMOTE_NAME="${1:-origin}"
TRACKED_REF_PREFIX="refs/tracked/$REMOTE_NAME"
REMOTE_REF_PREFIX="refs/remotes/$REMOTE_NAME"
declare -A remote_branch_lookup
while read -r remote_ref
do
# strip prefix, e.g. 'refs/remotes/origin/some-branch' -> 'some-branch'
branch_name="${remote_ref#$REMOTE_REF_PREFIX/}"
remote_branch_lookup["$branch_name"]=1
done < <(git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' "$REMOTE_REF_PREFIX/")
while read -r tracking_info
do
tracked_branch="${tracking_info#$TRACKED_REF_PREFIX/}"
if ! [[ -v "remote_branch_lookup[$tracked_branch]" ]]
then
echo "branch $tracked_branch has been removed from the remote, untracking it"
git update-ref -d "$TRACKED_REF_PREFIX/$tracked_branch"
tracking_refspec="+refs/heads*/$tracked_branch:refs/remotes*/$REMOTE_NAME/$tracked_branch"
git config unset --local --fixed-value --value "$tracking_refspec" "remote.$REMOTE_NAME.fetch"
fi
done < <(git for-each-ref --format='%(refname)' "$TRACKED_REF_PREFIX/")
So functionally I think this allows for the workflow I want, but does feel like
a big ol' hack :>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 16:31 Suggetsions for collaboration workflows in large repos Matthew Hughes
2026-05-29 17:56 ` Ben Knoble
2026-06-02 18:35 ` Matthew Hughes
2026-05-29 18:06 ` Matthew Hughes [this message]
2026-06-03 13:44 ` Toon Claes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahnUeESE1x802Z9N@desktop \
--to=matthewhughes934@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox