Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] builtin/refs: add "update" subcommand
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 09:28:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajJMnZchqdpiuKTg@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqeci6bupk.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 04:17:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > Add a new "update" subcommand which mirrors `git update-ref <refname>
> > <oldoid> <newoid>`. This follows the same reasoning as the preceding
> > commit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/git-refs.adoc |   7 ++
> >  builtin/refs.c              |  50 +++++++++++++
> >  t/meson.build               |   1 +
> >  t/t1465-refs-update.sh      | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 237 insertions(+)
> 
> I do not offhand know (and I am still away by 2 hours from the time
> I wake up and start functioning) if update-ref shares the same
> issue, but with "delete, update, rename" combo, lack of "create"
> feels a bit annoying.  Wouldn't we want to offer an option to users
> who want to ensure that the refs they create are truly new and they
> are not overwriting a ref somebody has created?  Either (1) drop
> "delete" and take a special value (e.g. "") as <newvalue> to signal
> deletion and make the same special value used as <oldvalue> signals
> creation, or (2) add "create" and insist that "update" takes only an
> existing ref, would make the annoyance go away, I guess.

In theory "update" can handle both updating existing references,
deleting them and creating them race-free by providing NUL object IDs
for either old or new value. But I agree that this is cumbersome, and
adding another "create" subcommand as an easy-to-understand shortcut
feels sensible.

> > +test_expect_success 'update creates a new reference' '
> > +	test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" &&
> > +	setup_repo repo &&
> > +	(
> > +		cd repo &&
> > +		A=$(git rev-parse A) &&
> > +		git refs update refs/heads/foo $A &&
> > +		test_ref_matches refs/heads/foo "$A"
> > +	)
> > +'
> 
> Here we cannot test (and I strongly suspect that "git refs update"
> and "git update-ref" lack ability to do so) a case where a creation
> is attempted on an existing ref and fails.

We can:

    $ git update-ref $NEW_OID $NULL_OID
    $ git refs update $NEW_OID $NULL_OID

This will verify that the reference doesn't exist before actually
writing it. Will add a test.

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-17  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-16  8:44 [PATCH 0/4] builtin/refs: add ability to write references Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-16  8:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] builtin/refs: drop `the_repository` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-16  8:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] builtin/refs: add "delete" subcommand Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-16  8:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] builtin/refs: add "update" subcommand Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-16 11:17   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-17  7:28     ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-06-17 12:11       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-16 14:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-17  7:28     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-16  8:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] builtin/refs: add "rename" subcommand Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-16 14:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-17  7:28     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-17 12:13       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-17 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] builtin/refs: add ability to write references Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-17 10:15   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] builtin/refs: drop `the_repository` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-17 10:15   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] builtin/refs: add "delete" subcommand Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-17 10:16   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] builtin/refs: add "update" subcommand Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-17 10:16   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] builtin/refs: add "create" subcommand Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-17 10:16   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] builtin/refs: add "rename" subcommand Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-17 12:26   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] builtin/refs: add ability to write references Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajJMnZchqdpiuKTg@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox