Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topology
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 15:53:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajk-a4a3KSJ2u7Ju@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622-toon-git-replay-drop-merges-v4-3-ff257f534319@iotcl.com>

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 02:41:57PM +0200, Toon Claes wrote:
> From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
> 
> One of the stated goals of git-replay(1) is to allow implementing the
> git-rebase(1) functionality on the server side.
> 
> The default mode of git-rebase(1) is to act as if `--no-rebase-merges`
> was given. This mode drops merge commits instead of replaying them, and
> linearizes the commit history into a sequence of the
> regular (single-parent) commits.
> 
> Add option `--linearize` to git-replay(1) to do the same.

git-rebase(1) essentially knows about three different modes:

  - "--no-rebase-merges", which is the default and maps to your
    "--linearize".

  - "--rebase-merges", which by default doesn't rebase cousins by using
    "--ancestry-path" internally.

  - "--rebase-merges=rebase-cousins", which doesn't pass the above
    option.

So it's not a simple boolean there, which makes me wonder whether we
should mirror the same interface so that all of git-rebase(1)'s modes
can be represented, as well.

> diff --git a/replay.c b/replay.c
> index 7921d7dba3..5539daff00 100644
> --- a/replay.c
> +++ b/replay.c
> @@ -277,12 +277,16 @@ static struct commit *pick_regular_commit(struct repository *repo,
>  					  struct commit *onto,
>  					  struct merge_options *merge_opt,
>  					  struct merge_result *result,
> +					  struct commit *replayed_base,
>  					  bool reverse,
>  					  enum replay_empty_commit_action empty)
>  {
> -	struct commit *base, *replayed_base;
> +	struct commit *base;
>  	struct tree *pickme_tree, *base_tree, *replayed_base_tree;
>  
> +	if (replayed_base && reverse)
> +		BUG("Linearizing commits is not supported when replaying in reverse");

Nit: Error messages should typically start with a lower-case letter.

> @@ -430,12 +435,25 @@ int replay_revisions(struct rev_info *revs,
>  	while ((commit = get_revision(revs))) {
>  		const struct name_decoration *decoration;
>  
> -		if (commit->parents && commit->parents->next)
> -			die(_("replaying merge commits is not supported yet!"));
> +		if (commit->parents && commit->parents->next) {
> +			if (!opts->linearize)
> +				die(_("replaying merge commits is not supported yet!"));
> +			/*
> +			 * Drop the merge commit: do not pick it and leave
> +			 * last_commit unchanged, so its children (and any ref
> +			 * pointing at it) are reparented onto the previous
> +			 * non-merge commit, which the ref-update loop below uses.
> +			 */

One could add a hint here that tells the user to pass the option. But I
guess that might be somewhat weird, as we cannot assume that we're
called by git-replay(1) here.

In any case, this here is the core of the change where we stop dying in
case "--linearize" was passed, and instead we simply skip the commit
altogether. Makes sense.

Thanks!

Patrick

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-22 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-08 18:37 [PATCH 0/3] Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commits Toon Claes
2026-06-08 18:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a bool Toon Claes
2026-06-08 18:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commits Toon Claes
2026-06-08 18:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topology Toon Claes
2026-06-08 19:29   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-10 14:26     ` Toon Claes
2026-06-10 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commits Toon Claes
2026-06-10 14:49   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a bool Toon Claes
2026-06-11 15:09     ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-12  8:19       ` Toon Claes
2026-06-10 14:49   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commits Toon Claes
2026-06-10 14:49   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topology Toon Claes
2026-06-10 17:02     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-16  8:38       ` Toon Claes
2026-06-14  6:56     ` Elijah Newren
2026-06-16  7:09       ` Toon Claes
2026-06-16  9:26   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commits Toon Claes
2026-06-16  9:26     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a bool Toon Claes
2026-06-16  9:26     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commits Toon Claes
2026-06-16  9:26     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topology Toon Claes
2026-06-22 12:41     ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Teach git-replay(1) to linearize merge commits Toon Claes
2026-06-22 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 1/3] replay: refactor enum replay_mode into a bool Toon Claes
2026-06-22 13:53         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-22 15:43           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-22 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 2/3] replay: add helper to put entry into mapped_commits Toon Claes
2026-06-22 13:53         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-22 12:41       ` [PATCH v4 3/3] replay: offer an option to linearize the commit topology Toon Claes
2026-06-22 13:53         ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ajk-a4a3KSJ2u7Ju@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=toon@iotcl.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox