From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] odb: make backend-specific fields optional
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:28:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akOoY4LKve0-ys9_@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <akKmwPGSAGEGKZjL@denethor>
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 12:25:21PM -0500, Justin Tobler wrote:
> On 26/06/24 02:19PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > diff --git a/builtin/cat-file.c b/builtin/cat-file.c
> > index 8726485f1f..adc626ce30 100644
> > --- a/builtin/cat-file.c
> > +++ b/builtin/cat-file.c
> > @@ -269,32 +301,20 @@ struct object_info {
> > */
> > time_t *mtimep;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Backend-specific information that tells the caller where exactly an
> > + * object was looked up from. This information should help disambiguate
> > + * object lookups in case the same object exists in multiple sources,
> > + * or multiple times in the same source.
> > + */
> > + struct object_info_source *sourcep;
>
> To me, the name `sourcep` makes me think a pointer to `struct
> odb_source`. This did confuse me slightly when initially reading, but
> I'm not sure it's worth it to be overly verbose here.
Yeah, good point. But as you say, I haven't been able to really come up
with a name that is not overly verbose. We could potentially rename the
structure itself to `odb_source_info` and then call the field itself
`source_infop`. Would that help?
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 12:19 [PATCH 0/6] odb: refactor source-specific information in object info Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-24 12:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] packfile: thread odb_source_packed through packed_object_info() Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 17:01 ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-30 11:28 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-24 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] odb: make backend-specific fields optional Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 17:25 ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-30 11:28 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-06-24 12:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] odb: add `source` field to struct object_info_source Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 17:49 ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-29 20:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-30 11:28 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-24 12:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] treewide: convert users of `whence` to the new source field Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 17:55 ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-24 12:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] odb: drop `whence` field from object info Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 17:57 ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-24 12:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] odb: document object info fields Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-24 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/6] odb: refactor source-specific information in object info Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akOoY4LKve0-ys9_@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox