Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] setup: introduce explicit repository discovery
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 17:19:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akwocdrzeu0xBLQZ@denethor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630-pks-setup-split-discovery-and-setup-v1-5-13864eb5a032@pks.im>

On 26/06/30 01:47PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> When setting up the global repository we intermix repository discovery
> and repository configuration: we repeatedly call `set_git_work_tree()`
> and `apply_and_export_relative_gitdir()` until we're happy with the
> result. The result of this is then a partially-configured repository
> that we use for further setup.
> 
> This process is quite hard to follow, as it's never quite clear which
> parts of the repository have been configured already and which haven't.
> Furthermore, it means that the repository configuration is distributed
> across many different places instead of having it neatly contained in a
> single location. Ultimately, this is the reason that we cannot use a
> central function like `repo_init()`.
> 
> Refactor the logic so that we stop partially-configuring a repository
> and instead populate a new `struct repo_discovery`. This allow us to
> essentially split repository setup into two phases:
> 
>   - The first phase only figures out parameters required to configure
>     the repository.
> 
>   - The second phase then takes these parameters and applies them to the
>     repository.

Ok so `struct repo_discovery` is just an intermediate structure to store
all the repository configuration so we can apply it all at once. Makes
sense.

> Like this, we'll never end up with a partially-configured repository and
> can eventually extend `repo_init()` to handle the full initialization
> for us.

So IIUC the expectation here would be for all configuration of the
repository to happen prior to it being applied? Would it be a bug to
attempt to apply configuration to a repository more than once? 

Overall, I like the direction of this patch so far :)

-Justin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-30 11:47 [PATCH 00/13] setup: split up repository discovery and setup Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 01/13] setup: rename `check_repository_format_gently()` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-06 21:27   ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 02/13] setup: mark bogus worktree in `apply_repository_format()` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 18:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-01  6:23     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-06 21:49   ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 03/13] setup: unify setup of shallow file Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-06 22:02   ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 04/13] setup: split up concerns of `setup_git_env_internal()` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 05/13] setup: introduce explicit repository discovery Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-06 22:19   ` Justin Tobler [this message]
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 06/13] setup: embed repository format in discovery Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 07/13] setup: move prefix into repository Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-06 22:33   ` Justin Tobler
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 08/13] setup: drop static `cwd` variable Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 09/13] setup: propagate prefix via repository discovery Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 10/13] setup: make repository discovery self-contained Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 11/13] setup: drop redundant configuration of `startup_info->have_repository` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 12/13] setup: pass worktree to `init_db()` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-30 11:47 ` [PATCH 13/13] setup: mark `set_git_work_tree()` as file-local Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akwocdrzeu0xBLQZ@denethor \
    --to=jltobler@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox