From: Peter Colberg <pcolberg@redhat.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>
Subject: Git 2.55.0 breaks revision path filtering with --no-walk
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:48:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alfWF9cBPESuLBgS@earendel> (raw)
Hi,
Since commit dd4bc01c0a8f ("revision: use priority queue for
non-limited streaming walks") in Git 2.55.0, git rev-list
--no-walk no longer considers optional <path>... arguments.
https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.2127.git.1779897003.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/
The following example lists all commits between two Linux kernel
releases that modify paths within a given directory and further
modified paths outside of that directory, too.
With Git 2.54.0, the second rev-list correctly filters by paths:
% git rev-list --topo-order v7.0..v7.1 -- drivers/gpu/drm/ | wc -l
2026
% git rev-list --topo-order v7.0..v7.1 -- drivers/gpu/drm/ | git rev-list --stdin --no-walk=unsorted -- ':!drivers/gpu/drm/' | wc -l
146
With Git 2.55.0, the second rev-list passes through all commits:
% git rev-list --topo-order v7.0..v7.1 -- drivers/gpu/drm/ | wc -l
2026
% git rev-list --topo-order v7.0..v7.1 -- drivers/gpu/drm/ | git rev-list --stdin --no-walk=unsorted -- ':!drivers/gpu/drm/' | wc -l
2026
Reverting commit dd4bc01c0a8f ("revision: use priority queue for
non-limited streaming walks") on top of Git 2.55.0 restores the
previous behaviour. Specifically, the following hunk that no longer
invokes process_parents() in the no_walk case causes the regression.
@@ -4390,12 +4394,13 @@ static struct commit *get_revision_1(struct rev_info *revs)
break;
case REV_WALK_STREAMING:
if (process_parents(revs, commit,
- &revs->commits, NULL) < 0) {
+ &revs->commit_queue) < 0) {
if (!revs->ignore_missing_links)
die("Failed to traverse parents of commit %s",
oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid));
}
break;
+ case REV_WALK_NO_WALK:
case REV_WALK_LIMITED:
break;
}
Is the behaviour in Git 2.55.0 intentional, i.e., was --no-walk never
intended to support path filtering, or is this indeed a regression?
Thanks,
Peter
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 18:48 Peter Colberg [this message]
2026-07-15 21:09 ` Git 2.55.0 breaks revision path filtering with --no-walk Kristofer Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alfWF9cBPESuLBgS@earendel \
--to=pcolberg@redhat.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krka@spotify.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox