From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petko Manolov Subject: Re: git and binary files Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:45:43 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Johannes Schindelin , David Symonds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Wincent Colaiuta X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 16 15:47:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JF9YF-00050K-Ea for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:47:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753959AbYAPOrG (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:47:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753938AbYAPOrF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:47:05 -0500 Received: from n152-u15.cabletel.bg ([89.253.152.15]:40044 "EHLO zztop.nucleusys.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753847AbYAPOrE (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:47:04 -0500 Received: from bender.nucleusys.com ([192.168.234.2]) by zztop.nucleusys.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JF9Xa-0007Ti-42; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:46:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > If the exact contents of these large binaries *really* don't matter, as > you say they don't, than why don't you just commit one and never touch > it again? Unfortunately those binaries does change, although the process is slow and not very frequent. And this is why it pokes me in the eye - for changing a few bytes i end up with much larger repository. Petko