From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-daemon: fix for rotating logs Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:53:44 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <7vtzhmaqpd.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080428182114.GF26880@genesis.frugalware.org> <20080428182917.GA4794@glandium.org> <20080428190047.GG26880@genesis.frugalware.org> <20080428192837.GB21950@cuci.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Stephen R. van den Berg" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 28 21:54:59 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JqZRB-0002nG-J0 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:54:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934977AbYD1Txh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:53:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933801AbYD1Txh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:53:37 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:42273 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S934970AbYD1Txf (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:53:35 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2008 19:53:33 -0000 Received: from cbg-off-client.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [141.5.11.5] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 28 Apr 2008 21:53:33 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX186Q7YMAIY6gxlymHKnjKL0u3NWulDiYP6ULBfmoS UtXqxbhWdbVwdH X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20080428192837.GB21950@cuci.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, since you seem to be very new to this list: we really appreciate a Reply-to-all here. On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote: > >> I have no idea, but other programs must have the same problem. I > >> should > > They don't. Your patch fixes the wrong problem. Please don't fix > something that wasn't broken in the first place. So do you have any ideas what is happening there? It seems that after logrotate does its thing, syslog() is stuck in the close() call. Any constructive help is very much appreciated. Ciao, Dscho