From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] make "git fetch" update all fetch repositories Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:26:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20080428181012.GB6710@steel.home> <48161544.90500@gnu.org> <20080428213339.GC10600@steel.home> <4816A989.2010204@gnu.org> <20080429053814.GA3332@steel.home> <4816C527.4000406@gnu.org> <4816CB46.1050100@op5.se> <4816D505.1000208@gnu.org> <20080429204417.GC6301@steel.home> <48178FD6.90104@gnu.org> <20080429213323.GA2413@steel.home> <48179625.3050704@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Alex Riesen , Andreas Ericsson , git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org, gitster@pobox.com, peff@peff.net, srb@cuci.nl To: Paolo Bonzini X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 30 00:27:24 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JqyID-0000X8-N8 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:27:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754783AbYD2W0e (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:26:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754566AbYD2W0e (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:26:34 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:34170 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752786AbYD2W0d (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:26:33 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2008 22:26:31 -0000 Received: from cbg-off-client.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO eeepc-johanness.mpi-cbg.de) [141.5.11.5] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 30 Apr 2008 00:26:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19i13YMopZi43p3hMF9yJe47MM01FNmQPTCN50R0J 4G+Gm7QYgBwiee X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <48179625.3050704@gnu.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I mean, I just wonder why as long as I had one remote only, I could > write "git push", while now I have to write "git push origin && git push > mirror". The patch to "git fetch" comes from this observation too, and > I think it is a good idea, even though I'm less attached to it and it > would influence my workflow much less. I wonder why you need to make such a big change, which _is_ incompatible, and not do the obvious thing, namely introduce a subcommand to "git remote" which does the "push" equivalent of "git remote update"... Do you really think that it is a good idea to push down a huge change like this down everybody else's throat, just because you do not want to type "git remote ..." but "git fetch ..." in your workflow? Ciao, Dscho