From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Fix diff regression for submodules not checked out Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 13:36:49 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <46dff0320804300856w941d948rbcc1cee06f1b41a9@mail.gmail.com> <1209735336-4690-1-git-send-email-pkufranky@gmail.com> <1209735336-4690-2-git-send-email-pkufranky@gmail.com> <1209735336-4690-3-git-send-email-pkufranky@gmail.com> <1209735336-4690-4-git-send-email-pkufranky@gmail.com> <7vfxt0wdkq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Ping Yin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 03 14:38:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JsH0F-000755-0p for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 03 May 2008 14:38:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753939AbYECMg4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 08:36:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752742AbYECMg4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 08:36:56 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:58964 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752689AbYECMgz (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 08:36:55 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 May 2008 12:36:53 -0000 Received: from dslb-088-067-214-063.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO dslb-088-067-214-063.pools.arcor-ip.net) [88.67.214.63] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 03 May 2008 14:36:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1888IM1SKc8FNQK0iLBC8rHcOm3eWXL02qNYi245U AEIKtxVrmfmQrW X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <7vfxt0wdkq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 2 May 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > By the way, "inexistent" is a word, but somehow it sounds quite awkward. In the same vein, I had to think about "stagable" for some time. I think the correct term is "stageable", but then, I am not sure if there is no better word anyway. Ciao, Dscho