From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-gc.txt: change --aggressive description Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 12:53:25 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1210672413-8761-1-git-send-email-pdebie@ai.rug.nl> <20080513105728.GA3088@mithlond.arda.local> <20080513110842.GB3088@mithlond.arda.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Pieter de Bie , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Teemu Likonen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 13 13:54:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jvt5G-0005Zk-Dw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 13 May 2008 13:54:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754331AbYEMLx3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 07:53:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754230AbYEMLx3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 07:53:29 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49322 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753154AbYEMLx2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 07:53:28 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 May 2008 11:53:26 -0000 Received: from wbgn128.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO racer.local) [132.187.25.128] by mail.gmx.net (mp053) with SMTP; 13 May 2008 13:53:26 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+eIuNMDSuePiq4DySYpr2Axb6bfY92LTIt+BL6eY yuCjTiTzXX+0v9 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <20080513110842.GB3088@mithlond.arda.local> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 13 May 2008, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Teemu Likonen wrote (2008-05-13 13:57 +0300): > > > But from ordinary user's point of view this raises questions: if gc > > --aggressive really is not that aggressive then the option itself is > > misleading. Why not change gc --aggressive to be really effective? > > Using high --window/--depth value etc. > > I mean, what I'm seeing many places is suggestions to run > > git repack -a -d -f --window=100 --depth=100 I posted a patch to use 250, not just 100, with --aggressive. See the mailing list archives for the discussion. Ciao, Dscho