From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updating documentation to match Brandon Casey's proposed
 git-repack patch.
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 09:26:26 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0805140925060.30431@racer>
References: <20080514072514.GA26202@foursquare.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
To: Chris Frey <cdfrey@foursquare.net>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 14 10:27:27 2008
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JwCKd-0006rE-5I
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 10:27:27 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758779AbYENI0b (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Wed, 14 May 2008 04:26:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757780AbYENI0a
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Wed, 14 May 2008 04:26:30 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:54938 "HELO mail.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1752700AbYENI02 (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 14 May 2008 04:26:28 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 May 2008 08:26:26 -0000
Received: from wbgn128.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO racer.local) [132.187.25.128]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp052) with SMTP; 14 May 2008 10:26:26 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1490710
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+vOupDOY2vLoqOK9YJSYI+aaJJw7CdoCjAPWgKeu
	275Q+2t6fA/Uol
X-X-Sender: gene099@racer
In-Reply-To: <20080514072514.GA26202@foursquare.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/82088>

Hi,

On Wed, 14 May 2008, Chris Frey wrote:

> I haven't heard any negative commentary on this patch, and I see
> the repack patch is in next, so resending in case it was missed.

This part, together with the subject, is not really meant for application 
as-is, is it?  Please follow the guidelines for SubmittingPatches, and 
write supporting arguments that are not meant to be part of the commit 
messages _after_ the "---".

Ciao,
Dscho