From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] diff options: Introduce --ignore-submodules Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 23:09:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <7vbq38oi3j.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vy76cn1aq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 15 00:10:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JwPAy-0002yO-Tg for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 15 May 2008 00:10:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757327AbYENWJK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 18:09:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752951AbYENWJK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 18:09:10 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46370 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756794AbYENWJI (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 18:09:08 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 May 2008 22:09:06 -0000 Received: from R2b68.r.pppool.de (EHLO racer.local) [89.54.43.104] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 15 May 2008 00:09:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19g6vkCSaBg4jGiwivFDYe0BGMl7ZkYGbNRyBEoKp XnQVYmvrGsjZRZ X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <7vy76cn1aq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 14 May 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > The point is: for the sake of a script (which wants to ignore > > submodules) asking if there is a diff, I think it makes sense to not > > ignore those changes. IOW I think my patch is enough for the purpose > > of getting stash/rebase to behave. > > But the patch is not about stash/rebase but affects all diff users, > doesn't it? Does it? I thought I hid all that special handling behind the --ignore-submodules options. Ciao, Dscho