From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Java Git (aka jgit) has switched to 3-clause BSD Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 12:32:44 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20080526044640.GB30245@spearce.org> <19f34abd0805260113w1341a26bg140d1dbb7438bf46@mail.gmail.com> <19f34abd0805260422m6d8c414dy746623ed609440eb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , Robin Rosenberg , Dave Watson , Marek Zawirski , git@vger.kernel.org, laforge@gnumonks.org To: Vegard Nossum X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 26 13:33:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K0axI-0003Xe-F7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 26 May 2008 13:33:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754146AbYEZLck (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 07:32:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754204AbYEZLck (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 07:32:40 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39950 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754175AbYEZLcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 07:32:39 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 May 2008 11:32:38 -0000 Received: from R4980.r.pppool.de (EHLO racer.local) [89.54.73.128] by mail.gmx.net (mp050) with SMTP; 26 May 2008 13:32:38 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19W6dUyLVJW0U23oh9auBjr7VecpUfTDU8BZzIFfO CjyeYNB5drFtB4 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0805260422m6d8c414dy746623ed609440eb@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 26 May 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote: > "As of the bleeding edge (40c5c6cb11b8cc6caf3ea6a681caf0a6b8d66f36 > [*4*]) the ownership of all currently surviving lines of code is > broken down as follows:" > > This seems to suggest that only authors of the "bleeding edge" are > considered, while my point was that the "bleeding edge" may be a > derivative of earlier versions which had other authors as well. AFAICT this was done with "git blame", so it might be "derived" by a particularly SCO-esque interpretation of the word, but it is really the work of those people Shawn mentioned. Besides, I do not think that there were any other authors anyway. In any case, this discussion is already boring me mightily, so I will tune out, Dscho