From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] builtin-fast-export: Add importing and exporting of revision marks Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:35:11 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1212663163-43064-1-git-send-email-pdebie@ai.rug.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Git Mailinglist To: Pieter de Bie X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 05 15:37:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K4Feg-0007bu-OP for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:37:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754176AbYFENge (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:36:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754141AbYFENge (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:36:34 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:34195 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754006AbYFENgd (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:36:33 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Jun 2008 13:36:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO racer.local) [128.177.17.254] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 05 Jun 2008 15:36:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/4dnlfirD4PjUS5spctW2g5RllZkl87yAvz50g68 gm145/HE4jVlby X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <1212663163-43064-1-git-send-email-pdebie@ai.rug.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Pieter de Bie wrote: > This adds the --import-marks and --export-marks to fast-export. These > import and export the marks used to for all revisions exported in a > similar fashion to what fast-import does. The format is the same as > fast-import, so you can create a bidirectional importer / exporter by > using the same marks file on both sides. Nicely done. As I said, I would like the pointer magic to be wrapped in a function so that this programmer does not get confused by it again, but it's not that important. IOW only do it if you agree strongly. Other than that, ACK. Ciao, Dscho