From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] cat-file --batch / --batch-check: do not exit if hashes are missing Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 00:34:43 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <1212967717-5165-1-git-send-email-LeWiemann@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Lea Wiemann X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 09 01:37:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K5URY-0001ni-RI for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:37:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753745AbYFHXgG (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:36:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753818AbYFHXgG (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:36:06 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:52541 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753676AbYFHXgE (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:36:04 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jun 2008 23:36:02 -0000 Received: from pacific.mpi-cbg.de (EHLO [10.8.0.10]) [141.5.10.38] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 09 Jun 2008 01:36:02 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19d4z4oqRtdD2kqT3taO7DHC4Y1OPjnNBZgHjMFIt 3WEYPqL7c7TCaj X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <1212967717-5165-1-git-send-email-LeWiemann@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, maybe s/do not exit/complain/? Because it still exits if the hashes are missing... > diff --git a/builtin-cat-file.c b/builtin-cat-file.c > index f8b3160..112b9db 100644 > --- a/builtin-cat-file.c > +++ b/builtin-cat-file.c > @@ -168,8 +168,11 @@ static int batch_one_object(const char *obj_name, int print_contents) > else > type = sha1_object_info(sha1, &size); > > - if (type <= 0) > - return 1; > + if (type <= 0) { > + printf("%s missing\n", obj_name); > + fflush(stdout); > + return 0; > + } Is it really intended that it returns 0 now? Further, should it not be an error("%s missin... instead? It is an error, isn't it? Ciao, Dscho