From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Non-inetd git-daemon hangs in syslog(3)/fclose(3) if --syslog --verbose accessing non-repositories Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:32:23 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <200807031400.36315.brian.foster@innova-card.com> <200807031552.26615.brian.foster@innova-card.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Foster X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 03 16:36:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KEPui-000619-Mh for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:36:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758907AbYGCOeT (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:34:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755678AbYGCOeT (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:34:19 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36364 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754012AbYGCOeS (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:34:18 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jul 2008 14:34:15 -0000 Received: from grape.st-and.ac.uk (EHLO grape.st-and.ac.uk) [138.251.155.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp064) with SMTP; 03 Jul 2008 16:34:15 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19L/AlFspNLXBFy3qzILrUum6qlhoCvIgv8E7nlxN mqribtfyyRAI6I X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <200807031552.26615.brian.foster@innova-card.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.72 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Brian Foster wrote: > On Thursday 03 July 2008 Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Brian Foster wrote: > > >[... describes that git-daemon -v syslog()s in a signal handler, > > > which is unsupported ...] > > > > I reported this bug earlier [ ... ] > > Ah, yes, I've (now) found the (long!) thread, about log-rotation > (which, as you observe, is not the problem). Yeah, sorry, should have mentioned that. > Sorry for the duplication. No need to be sorry. It may raise awareness so much that somebody gets a clever idea how to cope with it. Ciao, Dscho