Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git-svn sucks when it should not
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 02:00:21 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807070135450.7342@eeepc-johanness> (raw)

Hi Eric,

I have the pleasure of needing to work with a subversion project where 
parts of the webserver are password restricted.

In particular, I cannot access the parent directory, and one of 
the branches is protected, too.

Maybe you remember me describing that problem on IRC a few weeks ago: yes, 
it is still persistent.

Now, I thought that I know my way around Perl, at least a little bit, but 
while git-svn barfed on the repository, I... uhm, well, you probably get 
the idea.

The funny part is this: when I say "git svn clone $URL/trunk", or the same 
with the absolute paths to the single tags, instead of "git svn clone -s 
$URL", git-svn does the correct thing.  It works, importing the stuff as 
"git-svn".

So I tried to just edit out by hand the branches section, so that the 
password-protected branch would not be a problem.

The result was surprising: git svn fetch exited with success, but it 
did... absolutely nothing.

After a lot of frustrating hours, which were not at all helped by 
brilliant variable names such as "r" and "gsv", I now know this: the log 
contains paths that do not have a prefix "trunk", but "<dir>/trunk", 
where "<dir>" is the last directory of the URL.

Changing git-svn's URL to the parent of <dir> is a no-go, since that is -- 
as I mentioned above -- password protected.

Yes, in a perfect world I could just force the admin to change that, but 
no, this is not a perfect world, so do not even try to suggest that if 
you want to help.

Changing the fetch line to "<dir>/trunk:refs/remotes/trunk" does not work 
either, since git-svn cleverly checks $URL/<dir>/<dir>/trunk/.

I then tried to hack match_globs() and match_paths() to add that extra 
prefix to the patterns, so that that extra prefix + trunk would be 
matched and edited out.  This happened to work out alright.

But I tried for several hours to get in a proper solution which does not 
throw up on the tags, and I have to conclude that this piece of code is 
not hackable by anybody else but you.

So I stand defeated by your program.  Thank you.

My ugly, ugly workaround that is however easy, easy, is a shell script 
that uses curl to find out what refs are new, and clones each ref 
individually, then pushes all the results together into one repository.

Should not have been _that_ hard,
Dscho

             reply	other threads:[~2008-07-07  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-07  0:00 Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2008-07-07  9:44 ` git-svn sucks when it should not Eric Wong
2008-07-07 11:49   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-07 16:29     ` Avery Pennarun
2008-07-07 17:18       ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0807070135450.7342@eeepc-johanness \
    --to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox