From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] better git-submodule status output Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:00:07 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20080706160758.GA23385@jhaampe.org> <20080707062142.GA5506@jhaampe.org> <32541b130807070725p6fa4d0dfne9f04bc857920dc7@mail.gmail.com> <20080707145726.GI3696@joyeux> <7v8wwd4kvb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080708080042.GB3628@joyeux> <20080708122244.GE14794@joyeux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Avery Pennarun , Lars Hjemli , Ping Yin , Mark Levedahl , git@vger.kernel.org To: Sylvain Joyeux X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 08 15:01:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KGCor-0004jf-RV for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:01:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752132AbYGHNAV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:00:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752927AbYGHNAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:00:20 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:39811 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751656AbYGHNAT (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:00:19 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jul 2008 13:00:16 -0000 Received: from grape.st-and.ac.uk (EHLO grape.st-and.ac.uk) [138.251.155.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 08 Jul 2008 15:00:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+MBEkO9LaMYH6E9x90QrkGthjhjy8zZW3VjEkah3 kMTOdKZJRuJj7R X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <20080708122244.GE14794@joyeux> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6899999999999999 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Sylvain Joyeux wrote: > [somebody wrote] > > > [somebody else wrote] > > > > > What I was missing is, given the current discussion, a git-submodule > > > fetch alike to what Avery was proposing, which fetches all > > > submodules in one command. Having to do the fetch/update manually > > > for each submodule is really cumbersome -- I have around 30 modules > > > in the superproject. > > > > Did I not suggest "git submodule update" earlier? AFAIR this updates > > all submodules that have been initialized. > > ... and checkouts the commit registered in the superproject. Therefore > neither git-submodule status nor git-submodule summary can give an idea > of "what's new in submodules" Yeah, now I get what you are saying. So you want a "git submodule peek" or some such. Ciao, Dscho