From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] better git-submodule status output Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:54:05 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20080701150119.GE5852@joyeux> <20080709101330.GA3525@joyeux> <20080709134629.GA3848@joyeux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Sylvain Joyeux X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 09 15:55:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KGa8T-0001XW-9j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:55:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753216AbYGINyM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:54:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753118AbYGINyK (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:54:10 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:56993 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752555AbYGINyJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 09:54:09 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Jul 2008 13:54:07 -0000 Received: from grape.st-and.ac.uk (EHLO grape.st-and.ac.uk) [138.251.155.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 09 Jul 2008 15:54:07 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Ir6FVKkpIV4Pkexj+wyML++dIIx1waXSqNuJ//f 038gEP2heKvlmI X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <20080709134629.GA3848@joyeux> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.72 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Sylvain Joyeux wrote: > [Sylvain quoted somebody, but found it funny to let the reader guess] > > > On a related note, the long commit name has been a constant nuisance > > for me. A short commit name is perfectly enough, methinks. > > I also think so. The commit ID is completely useless for humans. > Nonetheless, that would change the git-submodules output which > (according to someone-that-I-dont-remember) would be a Bad Thing(tm). Is git-submodule supposed to be plumbing? I don't think so. Ciao, Dscho