From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Should we discuss Windows-related changes on
 git@vger.kernel.org?
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:37:50 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807120036090.8950@racer>
References: <DDFD7E3B-8401-4EA0-9BBA-C9D8E25998A3@zib.de> <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807111349470.3640@eeepc-johanness> <65365AC4-D7C9-462B-8239-F3B35F7ECBEF@zib.de> <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807111652170.8950@racer> <A065AF71-5685-423A-9F87-5349ADC6C9C9@zib.de>
 <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807111930160.8950@racer> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807111159560.2936@woody.linux-foundation.org> <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807112037220.8950@racer> <0E93411E-745C-4858-999E-F0B7487B48B1@zib.de> <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807112226190.8950@racer>
 <7vmykohvfy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>,
	msysGit <msysgit@googlegroups.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 12 01:38:51 2008
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1KHSCQ-0001Iq-BH
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:38:50 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754175AbYGKXhw (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:37:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754174AbYGKXhw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:37:52 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:50563 "HELO mail.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1754152AbYGKXhw (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:37:52 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2008 23:37:50 -0000
Received: from grape.st-and.ac.uk (EHLO grape.st-and.ac.uk) [138.251.155.28]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 12 Jul 2008 01:37:50 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1490710
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/FQXRyhUfFkSknliiN9cPvGMH7m4EVq6SMmenyXO
	D+pXSHHwlfB+vj
X-X-Sender: gene099@racer
In-Reply-To: <7vmykohvfy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.6899999999999999
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/88202>

Hi,

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > And if the separation is not always that clear, why not discuss those 
> > things on msysGit first, and then come to git@vger with our minds (and 
> > possibly our patches) made up?
> 
> I know you mean well, but my impression from reading the kernel list is 
> that often a message that says "we already debated this issue on our 
> list to death and here is our conclusion, take it or leave it" to the 
> audience is not accepted warmly, and more central kernel people may even 
> say "do not hide the discussion in the subsystem list, do it in the 
> open, discussion on the subsystem list does not matter".

I never meant on insisting that we find the final solution on the msysGit 
list, and I would _never_ suggest that anything sent to git@vger is final.  
It is always subject to discussion.

Anyway, enough said (since I think that you and me are in agreement here),
Dscho