From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@vger.kernel.org? Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:06:04 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <65365AC4-D7C9-462B-8239-F3B35F7ECBEF@zib.de> <7v4p6wjcgm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Steffen Prohaska , Johannes Sixt , msysGit , Git Mailing List To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 12 02:07:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KHSdn-00079a-TX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 02:07:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755154AbYGLAGK (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:06:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754918AbYGLAGJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:06:09 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51043 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752904AbYGLAGI (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:06:08 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2008 00:06:04 -0000 Received: from grape.st-and.ac.uk (EHLO grape.st-and.ac.uk) [138.251.155.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 12 Jul 2008 02:06:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/LKSRWO/3L0QUXqqXPEHCJY5CGUyE9Y49AlW8eXt +2pS1d8RYQLfjH X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > But we are talking about 4msysgit.git, no? > > I'm not. I'm just talking about Windows-related changes in git in > general, that are expected to be merged into regular git one way or > another. > > [...] > > But I'd certainly _hope_ that future windows work is incremental, and at > that point it's no longer a "drop the end result on people" situation. Fair enough. You'll get all the crap now, I expect. Seriously again, I really hope that things do not change very much. Even if the occasional patch will now come in directly to git@vger. Ciao, Dscho