From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-shell needs $(COMPAT_OBJS) Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:35:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <200807202111.48332.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <200807202334.36506.johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <7vzloc2odx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 21 00:35:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKhV1-00061R-RG for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:35:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752459AbYGTWe2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:34:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752223AbYGTWe2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:34:28 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:42051 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752183AbYGTWe2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:34:28 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2008 22:34:26 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 21 Jul 2008 00:34:26 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/y/88/edHyK0DgDfQ+9YdDJ5fY0Jch0d7ouQU9RV AeG49TDnkOkx71 X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <7vzloc2odx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.77 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Why do we care about the size of git-shell so much in the first place > anyway to begin with? It was not me who proposed it, but I guess it was for auditing purposes: git-shell is often the only point of entry for certain untrusted ssh users, and the less code is linked, the less code has to be analyzed for reachability (and then for security holes). Ciao, Dscho