From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix git-shell build error when NO_SETENV is defined Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:33:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1216601017-7871-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <20080721012928.GG5950@leksak.fem-net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: SungHyun Nam , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Stephan Beyer X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 21 03:33:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKkHj-0007IM-6v for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:33:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754385AbYGUBc4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:32:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754780AbYGUBc4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:32:56 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:60327 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754238AbYGUBcz (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:32:55 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2008 01:32:53 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 21 Jul 2008 03:32:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/O/upPqFfONkibpbSwB8e35m8L/BJibMfecAVwYu YMoOzkn4fowZAr X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20080721012928.GG5950@leksak.fem-net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Funny. It was not 24 hours ago that Hannes reported a related issue. And > > he was testing with different options. > > Oh, seems that I have missed that topic. Gna :) > > But fine if everything is working again then. No, it is not. Ciao, Dscho