From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC] Stopping those fat "What's cooking in git.git" threads Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:21:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20080720205125.GP10347@genesis.frugalware.org> <7vsku44679.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080721063332.GA15596@artemis.madism.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Miklos Vajna , git@vger.kernel.org To: Pierre Habouzit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 21 12:21:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKsWL-0006vC-6c for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:21:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757403AbYGUKUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:20:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756917AbYGUKUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:20:34 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33179 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756847AbYGUKUd (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:20:33 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2008 10:20:31 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 21 Jul 2008 12:20:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/4q9sl2p748wxdgJiAJV4DQHu9BOO8U7W6Cu/bzy V3Zr5n1n3EELjC X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20080721063332.GA15596@artemis.madism.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:05:30PM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Miklos Vajna writes: > > > > > So here is what I thought about: What about if everyone (except Junio, > > > of course) would change the subject _and_ remove the In-Reply-To: header > > > when replying to those mails? > > > > > > If those large threads just annoys a few people and most people are > > > happy with the current situation then sorry for the noise. > > > > I could make "What's cooking" not a follow-up to the previous issue, > > That'd be great, especially since it's trivial with decent MUAs to get > all issues with a filter (l in mutt, kmail/thunderbird has what it > needs, and I would be surprised if GNUS or pine cannot do that). But what you lose is the ability to tell "this cooking came directly after that cooking". And in the GMane interface, it is sure a nice thing to be able to go back and forth between cookings in a thread. Ciao, Dscho