From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add help.autocorrect to enable/disable autocorrecting Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:44:49 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20080722203730.GC5113@blimp.local> <20080722210354.GD5113@blimp.local> <20080722212633.GF5113@blimp.local> <20080722222510.GA4474@blimp.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Alex Riesen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 23 18:45:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLhTH-00043O-7A for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:45:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754006AbYGWQou (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:44:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754044AbYGWQou (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:44:50 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36702 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753720AbYGWQos (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:44:48 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2008 16:44:46 -0000 Received: from grape.st-and.ac.uk (EHLO grape.st-and.ac.uk) [138.251.155.28] by mail.gmx.net (mp056) with SMTP; 23 Jul 2008 18:44:46 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18/dHdVdY4/OOYUcr0uwugAtQYVpPbwKFOu7Ft4rH 44aPXjtzBixhxv X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <20080722222510.GA4474@blimp.local> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.62 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Alex Riesen wrote: > Johannes Schindelin, Tue, Jul 22, 2008 23:44:50 +0200: > > However, I think that the intention of this patch is too much DWIMery, > > which might be good for me (just like my "git add remote" patch), but > > not for the general audience. > > Mustn't be good for all You meant "needn't"? It is good for me ;-) > And thanks for sharing. You're welcome. > + n = 1; > + while (n < main_cmds.cnt && > + best_similarity == similarity(main_cmds.names[n]->name)) > + ++n; Mini-nit: you never ask for the value of n, only if it is 1 or larger. So you do not need to count... Ciao, Dscho