From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git-scm.com Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:25:16 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Scott Chacon X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 26 04:25:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMZT9-0006h0-B1 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:25:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752409AbYGZCYP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:24:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752422AbYGZCYP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:24:15 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:52650 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752404AbYGZCYP (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:24:15 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 02:24:13 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp064) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2008 04:24:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//oF8N0Nb/9OZBLZrcZEPz0HUWnlm2JIiQ26UJmp 8K9kfk3B8JJZrR X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Scott Chacon wrote: > A followup on the post I did a few days ago about Git documentation. > I forked Petr's git.or.cz site and put up a version that I think is a > bit more accessible and newbie-friendly at git-scm.com. I do not like the implication that Git eats trees. I also do not like that the link to "Documentation" looks more like a too-short cheat-sheet. > I had meant to discuss this with Petr before posting it to you all, but > I published a blog post that got a bit more attention than I expected, > and I didn't want you all to think I didn't care about your opinion, as > some have already accused me of. My first reaction was: he could have given Pasky a little more time to react. But then, I think that git.or.cz looks more professional (read: more respectful, less geekish), so I think there is not much harm in that. Ciao, Dscho