From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC] custom strategies in builtin-merge Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:37:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20080725113316.GF32057@genesis.frugalware.org> <7viqutpjqq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vvdyto3da.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: sverre@rabbelier.nl, Miklos Vajna , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 26 04:37:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMZea-0000Lz-Pc for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 04:37:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752508AbYGZCgE (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:36:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752512AbYGZCgD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:36:03 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55232 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752339AbYGZCgB (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:36:01 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 02:36:00 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2008 04:36:00 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18/4At4r/4/0PGHnQZAJScESStFrdxuS8UKBlqSr2 6CAt5EQQxihK7A X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <7vvdyto3da.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.67 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > ... especially since I hope that we have them builtin soon, and not > > only that, but have builtin-merge call them as C functions, not with > > fork() and exec(). > > Because builtin-merge.c does not directly use fork/exec but uses > run_command() interface, non POSIX platforms can spawn subprocesses just > fine, can't they? Yes, they can. Slowly, but they do. But why should they? Efficient merging is such a prominent feature of Git; I do not agree to let it remain a second-class feature. Ciao, Dscho