From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make use of stat.ctime configurable Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:45:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20080725055547.GA3699@blimp.local> <20080726153802.GA16868@blimp.local> <7v1w1f155p.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080728063128.GA4234@blimp.local> <20080728160446.GA16351@old.davidb.org> <7vbq0ho5g7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v3alto4r7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080729014120.GA26807@old.davidb.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Linus Torvalds , Alex Riesen , Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 12:44:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNmhK-0006wr-G7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:44:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754798AbYG2Kny (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:43:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753982AbYG2Kny (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:43:54 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:60852 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754729AbYG2Knx (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:43:53 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2008 10:43:50 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 12:43:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19fPZgD/dtfRfQuVGSMpu9884/CVA1FGjiI0T+zMG gSB48XBBnyqHvS X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20080729014120.GA26807@old.davidb.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, David Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 06:31:24PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Why does "rename(old, new)" change st_ctime when you move a regular > >file? > > But, from the point of view of backup software, not updating the ctime > on rename would be horrible, because you'd never know when files got > renamed. Any backup software that does not discover that there is a new _filename_ is not worth the label "software". Rather "daftware" or somesuch. Ciao, Dscho