From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git-svn and svn:externals, was Re: Hackontest ideas? Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:04:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20080729000103.GH32184@machine.or.cz> <200807291428.32072.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Petr Baudis , Eric Wong , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 15:04:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNos5-0003I1-Qk for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:04:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752969AbYG2NDK (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:03:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752876AbYG2NDI (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:03:08 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:33519 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752188AbYG2NDG (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:03:06 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2008 13:03:04 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp042) with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 15:03:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+HCEEYh+aHTDK5Y+XHum1GNHGEyBwnaNiq6hcMVJ fffk816oScax9z X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <200807291428.32072.jnareb@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.66 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > * handling of svn:externals using submodules > > > > The main concern I have is to get the semantics right: AFAICT > > svn:externals has _no notion_ of "what is current". It just _always_ > > fetches the HEAD. Even if you check out an ancient revision in the > > "superproject". > > If I understand correctly with version 1.5 svn:externals can be > specified using "peg revisions", so they could refer to some specific > revision of 'external', like git submodules. ... which only means that if they had done that from the beginning, it the git-svn enhancement would be easy. But as they did not have it from the beginning, anybody tackling git-svn and svn:externals will have to come up with sensible semantics for the hard case. Ciao, Dscho