From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git-svn and svn:externals, was Re: Hackontest ideas? Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:17:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20080729000103.GH32184@machine.or.cz> <20080729130823.GB30334@bit.office.eurotux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jakub Narebski , Petr Baudis , Eric Wong , git@vger.kernel.org To: Luciano Rocha X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 15:17:26 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNp4j-00087M-33 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:17:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753448AbYG2NQN (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:16:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753437AbYG2NQM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:16:12 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:43408 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753427AbYG2NQM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:16:12 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2008 13:16:09 -0000 Received: from 88-107-142-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (EHLO eeepc-johanness.st-andrews.ac.uk) [88.107.142.10] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 29 Jul 2008 15:16:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18XerMpjI0XTnPcwZ5cRejtarafXlN3Wm/JlpmEw0 zQShafM61lNB5p X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20080729130823.GB30334@bit.office.eurotux.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Luciano Rocha wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:56:37PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > * handling of svn:externals using submodules > > > > The main concern I have is to get the semantics right: AFAICT > > svn:externals has _no notion_ of "what is current". It just _always_ > > fetches the HEAD. Even if you check out an ancient revision in the > > "superproject". > > Usually, yes. But you could specify a specific revision with -r . I do not see how that helps defining the semantics for git-svn at all. > With the new 1.5, it is also possible to specify pegged revisions. Much > better, because otherwise subversion would require that the path existed > in the server in HEAD. As I already commented, the possibility (and for most svn repositories, the likelihood) that nothing is pegged makes this less helpful, either. Ciao, Dscho