From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] bash completion: remove deprecated --prune from git-gc Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:17:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <200812132008.08543.markus.heidelberg@web.de> <20081214111213.GA6499@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Markus Heidelberg , gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Dec 14 12:17:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBoy7-0003jH-IY for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:17:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754320AbYLNLPm (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:15:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754421AbYLNLPm (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:15:42 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:45982 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754320AbYLNLPl (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:15:41 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2008 11:15:38 -0000 Received: from ini-firewall.unizh.ch (EHLO eeepc-johanness) [130.60.5.218] by mail.gmx.net (mp049) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2008 12:15:38 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+obSEIAUyoveOmqcf0qNVWlb6A23Iih0kQ0XilJF NAUuSxuhksXzgD X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20081214111213.GA6499@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:38:17AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > - __gitcomp "--prune --aggressive" > > > + __gitcomp "--aggressive" > > git gc --prune is deprecated? That's news to me. > > Check out 9e7d501 (builtin-gc.c: deprecate --prune, it now really has no > effect, 2008-05-09). > > Which annoyingly has no discussion about _why_ it no longer has an > effect. But I suspect it has something to do with 25ee973 (gc: call > "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago" by default, 2008-03-12) by you. Oops. But I thought that git gc --prune does expire _all_ dangling loose objects _now_, not with --expire 2.weeks.ago. Ciao, Dscho