From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2008, #02; Sun, 14) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:24:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <7v7i632mg9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20081214111548.GB6499@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Dec 14 12:24:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LBp4z-0005N0-Kq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:24:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753140AbYLNLWw (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:22:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753015AbYLNLWw (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:22:52 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36513 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752918AbYLNLWv (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:22:51 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2008 11:22:49 -0000 Received: from ini-firewall.unizh.ch (EHLO eeepc-johanness) [130.60.5.218] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 14 Dec 2008 12:22:49 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19ZdQBWvABZEbLTUGOl0zCXkarAHbQjq2/WUgqKHv Jq+FQ6Uen7mvMk X-X-Sender: user@eeepc-johanness In-Reply-To: <20081214111548.GB6499@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.63 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:44:23AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > * mv/um-pdf (Wed Dec 10 23:44:50 2008 +0100) 1 commit > > > - Add support for a pdf version of the user manual > > > > > > I do not have a new enough combination of dblatex and asciidoc myself > > > but this would help interested people. > > > > I haven't had a look at the patches, but isn't "pdflatex" supposed to be > > the common way to get .pdf files from LaTeX sources? > > But we don't have latex sources; we have docbook sources. Hence dblatex > (which does the conversion to PDF internally, so it is a bit of a > misnomer). Indeed, I was fooled. Thanks for the clarification, Dscho