From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Git Notes idea. Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:08:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <5d46db230812160015t55b4ff2fubbf1e2f826a97b98@mail.gmail.com> <20081216085108.GA3031@coredump.intra.peff.net> <5d46db230812161043m4a5873a8w4c323d634b639ba0@mail.gmail.com> <5d46db230812161815s1c48af9dwc96a4701fb2a669b@mail.gmail.com> <20081217101110.GC18265@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7voczaobhb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jeff King , Govind Salinas , Git Mailing List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 18 04:10:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LD9Hf-0000lA-3Y for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:10:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751441AbYLRDJU (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:09:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751410AbYLRDJT (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:09:19 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:45871 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751350AbYLRDJT (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:09:19 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2008 03:09:16 -0000 Received: from pD9EB2D4F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO noname) [217.235.45.79] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 18 Dec 2008 04:09:16 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+9jVxra6m90Uvmdc9pw/CKE96gC/Bs6ObEHsqxCo ydf7zDQ9rpoYj2 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <7voczaobhb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.68 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > ... But the main point still stands: you go from commit to note, not > > from note to commit. And this is in stark contrast to tags, where you > > go from tag to commit, _not_ from commit to tag. > > > > That is a fundamental _difference_ between tags and notes, so that I > > refuse to accept the notion of notes being a generalized form of tags. > > Hmm, how would you explain things like "git describe" (and "name-rev")? Programs? Ciao, Dscho