From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Heads up: major rebase -i -p rework coming up Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:24:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <200901242347.23187.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Sverre Rabbelier X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 25 16:25:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LR6rl-0005kw-ET for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:25:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755433AbZAYPYU (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:24:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754093AbZAYPYT (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:24:19 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57975 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753115AbZAYPYT (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:24:19 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2009 15:24:17 -0000 Received: from pD9EB3E0E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO noname) [217.235.62.14] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 25 Jan 2009 16:24:17 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18yMclMNM8yEU4KWiEkGBm92R37QJ/cBTCsritsBd +PCKzlvvx9Uxu0 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.62 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 15:17, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > >> >> merge (B) A # Merge... > >> > merge B parent A' # Merge... > >> merge B with A' # Merge... > > merge B Merge bla/blub > > parent A' bla/blub > > Oh goody, more painting! I was wondering when the next pick-a-word > contest would be! In this case, it is not about painting. I will gladly ignore all those who think they must submit a new word for this action. The thing is: I want the command to be intuitive, so I need a syntax where even the most idiotic dullard will understand what are the parents, and why we need the original merge's commit name, too. So maybe I answered my question myself: merge parents $sha1 [$sha1...] original $sha1 $msg Ciao, Dscho