From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Heads up: major rebase -i -p rework coming up Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:59:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <200901242347.23187.trast@student.ethz.ch> <7vwscjceec.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Sverre Rabbelier , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 25 22:00:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRC5V-0007zS-OB for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:00:14 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751324AbZAYU6t (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:58:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751304AbZAYU6t (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:58:49 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46271 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751297AbZAYU6t (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:58:49 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2009 20:58:46 -0000 Received: from pD9EB3E0E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO noname) [217.235.62.14] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 25 Jan 2009 21:58:46 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19N/u0+nWhNElCqOj4fphKcgxsPQpjQXVM2zxHS3m sJOKP9IDoC6nj8 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer In-Reply-To: <7vwscjceec.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.62 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > So maybe I answered my question myself: > > > > merge parents $sha1 [$sha1...] original $sha1 $msg > > When you are reparenting, how would original commit get in the picture? > You wouldn't want the resulting merge to claim it merged X (which would be > what's in original's commit log) when in fact it now merged Y because the > user reparented it, would you? Oh yes, I would! Example: A - B - C / X - Y If I merged X into B by accident, but actually meant to merge Y, then C' should still come after B', no? Ciao, Dscho