From: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
To: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Cc: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 04/20] rebase: remove unused rebase state 'prev_head'
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:45:49 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1011261919540.17721@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CEF67AB.6050700@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Martin von Zweigbergk venit, vidit, dixit 25.11.2010 20:57:
> > The rebase state 'prev_head' is not used. Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> The actual value of prev_head was never used. But the check for its
> non-nullness made sure that git-rev-parse HEAD^0 succeeded when
> $merge_dir was created. Have you made sure that we don't need that check?
In continue_merge, the value written to prev_head is the output from
`git rev-parse HEAD^0`. The value written to prev_head when the rebase
is initiated seems to be `git rev-parse -q --verify` for some
reference. In the latter case, the rebase is aborted if the exit code
from rev-parse is non-zero. The prev_head file is only deleted when
the whole $merge_dir is deleted.
Unless I'm mistaken, the above taken together seems to mean that
$prev_head can only be empty if the output of rev-parse is empty. I'm
still way to unfamiliar with the Git C code to be able to figure out
if and when that may happen, but I'm sure you guys can help. The most
likely candidate I could think of was an orphan branch (same thing as
an unborn branch?), but even in that case was the output non-empty
(`git rev-parse HEAD^0` simply resulted in 'HEAD^0').
Do you see any case where we do need the check?
/Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-27 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-25 19:57 [PATCH/RFC 00/20] Refactor rebase Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 01/20] rebase: clearer names for directory variables Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 02/20] rebase: refactor reading of state Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 03/20] rebase: read state outside loop Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 04/20] rebase: remove unused rebase state 'prev_head' Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-26 7:54 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-11-26 18:45 ` Martin von Zweigbergk [this message]
2010-11-29 21:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-11-30 7:29 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 05/20] rebase: act on command line outside parsing loop Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 06/20] rebase: collect check for existing rebase Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 07/20] rebase: stricter check on arguments Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 08/20] rebase: align variable names Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 09/20] rebase: align variable content Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 10/20] rebase: factor out command line option processing Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 11/20] rebase -i: remove now unnecessary directory checks Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 12/20] rebase: reorder validation steps Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 13/20] rebase: factor out reference parsing Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 14/20] rebase: factor out clean work tree check Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 15/20] rebase: factor out call to pre-rebase hook Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 16/20] rebase -i: support --stat Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 17/20] rebase: improve detection of rebase in progress Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 18/20] rebase -m: extract code to new source file Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 19/20] rebase: extract am " Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 19:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 20/20] rebase: show consistent conflict resolution hint Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-25 20:23 ` [PATCH/RFC 00/20] Refactor rebase Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-26 14:10 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2010-11-26 19:16 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2010-11-27 1:24 ` Sverre Rabbelier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.10.1011261919540.17721@debian \
--to=martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).