git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Jonathan Smith <Jonathan.Smith@fphcare.co.nz>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:16:45 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1601280913450.2964@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0429EC95C2F44528E2A1336FB7A2D98@PhilipOakley>

Hi Philip,

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Philip Oakley wrote:

> From: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
> > Jonathan Smith <Jonathan.Smith@fphcare.co.nz> writes:
> >
> > > It's pretty clear that code stored in a Git repository isn't
> > > considered a derived work of Git, regardless of whether it is used
> > > in a commercial context or otherwise.
> 
> I'm guessing here, but I suspect that while its 'pretty clear' to Jonathan,
> that he has met others who aren't so clear or trusting, and it's that
> distrustful community that would need convincing.

It is not so much distrust as something you could take to court, I guess,
because an *authoritative* answer was asked for. Now, the question is a
legal one, so it is pretty clear (;-)) to me that only a lawyer could give
that answer.

Having said that, I know of plenty of companies storing their proprietary
code in Git repositories, and I would guess that they cleared that with
their lawyers first.

Jonathan, please do not take that as any indication that I try to give
this answer: if you want an authoritative answer to your question, you
really need to consider asking a lawyer.

Ciao,
Dscho

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-28  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-25  3:08 GPL v2 authoritative answer on stored code as a derived work Jonathan Smith
2016-01-25 19:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-27 23:58   ` Philip Oakley
2016-01-28  8:16     ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2016-01-31 20:51       ` Philip Oakley
2016-01-31 21:00       ` [RFC/PATCH] Git doc: GPL2 does not apply to repo data Philip Oakley
2016-01-31 22:08         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-01-31 22:15           ` Jonathan Smith
2016-02-01  7:35             ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-01  7:49               ` Matthieu Moy
2016-02-01  8:14                 ` Jeff King
2016-02-01  8:16                   ` Jeff King
2016-02-01 10:57                   ` Philip Oakley
2016-02-01 10:53           ` Philip Oakley
2016-02-01 11:34             ` Philip Oakley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1601280913450.2964@virtualbox \
    --to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=Jonathan.Smith@fphcare.co.nz \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).