From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t6302: drop unnecessary GPG requirement
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:06:18 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1602020805280.2964@virtualbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq4mdsw949.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > An even easier solution might be to *not* set up the signed tags in the
> > 'setup' part, but only in the respective test case, and delete them right
> > away after said test case?
>
> After reading your patch, I do not find it an "easier solution", at
> least with the definition of the word "solution" I would use. It
> stops testing signed or doubly signed tags everywhere, assuming that
> future regressions can ever break only --points-at tests and no
> other tests around signed tags.
True.
> > Something like this (I even tested this with and without the GPG prereq):
> > ...
> > -test_expect_success 'check signed tags with --points-at' '
> > +test_expect_success GPG 'check signed tags with --points-at' '
> > + git tag -s -m "A signed tag message" signed-tag side &&
> > + git tag -s -m "Annonated doubly" double-tag signed-tag &&
> > + test_when_finished git tag -d signed-tag &&
>
> Interestingly, double-tag is not removed here.
Whooopsie.
I retract the patch in any case ;-)
Ciao,
Dscho
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-31 20:19 [PATCH] t6302: drop unnecessary GPG requirement Eric Sunshine
2016-02-01 2:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-01 7:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-02-01 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-02-02 7:06 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1602020805280.2964@virtualbox \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).